Most people making AI ads start with the image. I start with the brief. That's not a creative philosophy, it's a reflex built over seven-plus years of work where the details weren't optional.
My last role was managing enterprise partnerships across academic medical centers, federal institutions, legal teams, and clinical ops simultaneously. That included building marketing collateral with creative teams, developing partner-facing landing pages, and working with PMRC on content that had to be accurate, on-brand, and cleared fast. You learn quickly how to read what a stakeholder actually needs versus what they're asking for, and how to build systems that produce consistent output even when everything else is moving.
I bring that same approach to creative projects. Every piece in this portfolio starts with a research-backed brief, runs through a structured generation system, and produces output that can be evaluated, iterated, and scaled. I can tell you exactly what the strategic reasoning is behind every creative decision in here.
Topicals was founded because their founder spent years being told by dermatologists that they didn't know how to treat her skin. That's not a brand backstory, that's the brief. I built a full creative system for a BIPOC-founded skincare brand whose entire competitive edge is specificity. Real ingredients, real awards, the actual shades and skin conditions that mainstream beauty treated as an edge case.
← Replace placeholder slots with your Topicals ad images
Every generation prompt was built on top of these two reference documents, uploaded alongside each Nano Banana prompt to enforce brand consistency across all outputs.
Grammarly's challenge isn't awareness, it's a generation of their users who've decided ChatGPT is close enough. Each of the three concepts targets a distinct reason someone stays: behavioral habit (it lives in every app they already use), product proof (seeing it work in real time), and direct competitive positioning (what ChatGPT actually can't replicate). Three objections, three emotional entry points, one brief.
Nostalgia is Olipop's actual product and the soda is just the vehicle. Their creative strategy leans into that: a cream soda on a golden-hour porch after a long day at the beach isn't a health ad, it's the feeling of a summer you actually remember. The fiber count and lower sugar land as proof once you're already in that memory. Two directions were tested, lifestyle UGC to pull the emotional trigger and product hero to close with the ingredients, with format chosen before visual direction, not after.
DripDrop markets to athletes and performance-seekers. The growth opportunity is everyone else. People who aren't hydrating for sport, but because there's always a next thing. Three underserved personas, three distinct creative angles, each built from real behavioral insight rather than category assumptions.
"Not for performance. For everything after."
DripDrop's doctor-developed credibility and lower sugar positioning makes them uniquely suited to own the caregiver segment: an audience that doesn't see itself in sports drink ads but is chronically depleted.
Analyzed three real ad accounts from Motion's Creative Benchmarks and Content Engine reports. The goal: identify what actually drives performance, not just what looks good. Two clear principles emerged from the data.
Go face-first. Real person on camera within the first two seconds, every brief going forward. The more interesting test is what happens right after the hook. Eliah's numbers suggest there's conversion left on the table between seconds 4 and 15. Tightening that transition could close the gap between stopping power and actual conversion.
"The first frame is a human handshake, not branding."
Face-first hooks win. Every ad that opened with a real person on camera (Julia: 52.89%, Eliah: 60.7%) cleared 40%+ thumbstop. Text and graphic-led ads (Levi: 13.02%) barely broke 15%. Format is the first decision, not an afterthought.
"A monster hook can carry the whole funnel."
Eliah's hold rate was only 14.75% but still delivered the cheapest conversion in both reports at CA$2.98 per form. Volume of attention at the top compensated for mid-funnel drop-off. Hook quality is the highest leverage variable in the entire ad.
I spent almost a decade in clinical research and enterprise partnerships, coordinating across academic medical centers, federal institutions, and health systems on work that couldn't afford to be wrong. Part of that was creative: building marketing collateral with agency and clinical teams, developing co-branded landing pages for research partnerships, and writing patient-facing health content that had to be accurate, approved, and actually readable by a real person. Translating complex, high-stakes information into something a human being will act on is exactly what performance creative asks you to do.
This portfolio is proof I can build the architecture behind creative, not just the output. The Y2K camcorder treatment on the Topicals animated piece wasn't a happy accident. It was a deliberate decision rooted in the brand's actual cultural DNA.
I don't confuse a pretty output for effective output. It's often treated as a tradeoff. I treat it as the brief.
All work is speculative. Not affiliated with or commissioned by Topicals, Grammarly, or Olipop.